<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Twofold Gaze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Sharpen the twofold gaze, perception and sight.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 01:17:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality III by Kareem Carr</title>
		<link>http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/the-cauchy%e2%80%93schwarz-inequality-iii/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kareem Carr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 01:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/?p=901#comment-431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Typo. Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality III by Kareem Carr</title>
		<link>http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/the-cauchy%e2%80%93schwarz-inequality-iii/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kareem Carr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 01:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/?p=901#comment-430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s been so long ago since I wrote this, but probably I left the case i=1 as self-evident.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been so long ago since I wrote this, but probably I left the case i=1 as self-evident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality III by Jeroen</title>
		<link>http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/the-cauchy%e2%80%93schwarz-inequality-iii/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeroen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/?p=901#comment-426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you apply the assumption of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for lists of length k, why is the summation on the left side of the expression till n, and not till k?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you apply the assumption of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for lists of length k, why is the summation on the left side of the expression till n, and not till k?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality III by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/the-cauchy%e2%80%93schwarz-inequality-iii/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/?p=901#comment-424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about the case i=1?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the case i=1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In the Long Run We Are All Dead by lindylad</title>
		<link>http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/in-the-long-run-we-are-all-dead/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lindylad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/?p=593#comment-373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess what I&#039;m missing is how they know that only two eye colours are possible.  It&#039;s probable but not 100% certain that there are only two colours, but a third colour is possible and since they do not possess a method of determining their own eye colour for certain, the doubt of the possibility of hazel or green eyes must prevent mass suicide.

While I do appreciate the nested logic, I can&#039;t see anyone committing suicide once three blue eyed people exist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what I&#8217;m missing is how they know that only two eye colours are possible.  It&#8217;s probable but not 100% certain that there are only two colours, but a third colour is possible and since they do not possess a method of determining their own eye colour for certain, the doubt of the possibility of hazel or green eyes must prevent mass suicide.</p>
<p>While I do appreciate the nested logic, I can&#8217;t see anyone committing suicide once three blue eyed people exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making Nice Images of Equations in Windows by Warren Lockhart</title>
		<link>http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/making-nice-images-of-equations-in-windows/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren Lockhart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 23:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/?p=644#comment-335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you very much, this saved me some time. I have a suggestion from the experience of using your script - because the dollar signs indicate inline latex, the fraction part shrinks to the height of stuff on the other side of an equal sign. Two solutions are 1) include package amsmath and use \dfrac instead of \frac, or 2) use \displaystyle after the first dollar. I tried to use \begin{equation} and \end{equation} in your preamble and postamble files, but this does not seem to work (complains about missing dollar), so the two solutions above seem best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much, this saved me some time. I have a suggestion from the experience of using your script &#8211; because the dollar signs indicate inline latex, the fraction part shrinks to the height of stuff on the other side of an equal sign. Two solutions are 1) include package amsmath and use \dfrac instead of \frac, or 2) use \displaystyle after the first dollar. I tried to use \begin{equation} and \end{equation} in your preamble and postamble files, but this does not seem to work (complains about missing dollar), so the two solutions above seem best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In the Long Run We Are All Dead II by Some stuff &#187; two inductive problems</title>
		<link>http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/in-the-long-run-we-are-all-dead-ii/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Some stuff &#187; two inductive problems]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/?p=716#comment-300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] further explanations of this puzzle here and here, where the synchronization can also be interpreted as between all &#8220;levels&#8221; of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] further explanations of this puzzle here and here, where the synchronization can also be interpreted as between all &#8220;levels&#8221; of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In the Long Run We Are All Dead by Some stuff &#187; two inductive problems</title>
		<link>http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/in-the-long-run-we-are-all-dead/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Some stuff &#187; two inductive problems]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/?p=593#comment-299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] further explanations of this puzzle here and here, where the synchronization can also be interpreted as between all &#8220;levels&#8221; of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] further explanations of this puzzle here and here, where the synchronization can also be interpreted as between all &#8220;levels&#8221; of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Kareem Carr</title>
		<link>http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/about/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kareem Carr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bob, thanks for the quote!  Yeah, I am still into visualizations.  Unfortunately, producing nice ones can take quite a bit of time.  So, I don&#039;t get to do this sort of work as often as I would like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob, thanks for the quote!  Yeah, I am still into visualizations.  Unfortunately, producing nice ones can take quite a bit of time.  So, I don&#8217;t get to do this sort of work as often as I would like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LaTeX2WP, a LaTeX to WordPress converter by Luqing Ye</title>
		<link>http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/2009/11/28/latex2wp-a-latex-to-wordpress-converter/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luqing Ye]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 08:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twofoldgaze.wordpress.com/?p=897#comment-237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems Latex2pw do not support Latex essay which involve Chinese.Only support English]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems Latex2pw do not support Latex essay which involve Chinese.Only support English</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
